https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6419
--- Comment #12 from Sidney Markowitz <[email protected]> 2010-07-21 15:53:22 EDT --- (in reply to comment #11) Commits to trunk are CTR (Commit then review), no votes required (or rather, only the one implied vote of the person committing it is required) but anyone can notice a problem and veto it to have the commit reverted. Commits to branches are RTC, requiring three votes and no vetoes before committing. Since only one vote is needed to commit to trunk, in general the committer who is proposing a patch for branch commits to trunk at the same time that they post the patch and call for votes for branch. Of course it can go somewhat differently if you are asking for opinions or review before you are sure that you like your own proposal, or if the patch is submitted by a non-committer and so doesn't even have one vote yet. But it is important to have the process such that it is difficult to accidentally forget to commit something to trunk that has been committed to branch. That has happened before with unfortunate results. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
