On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:

On 31/10/2010 4:21 PM, John Hardin wrote:
 On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:

>  Whoa... do we know why this happened?

 The sandbox masscheck score generator is still generating zero scores
 for things. You took a look at it a while back and twiddled it a bit,
 but didn't completely fix it.

I wonder if its not "activating" rules that have only been "activated" because they're, too, used as a dependency.

I think I'll parse the --lint output for warnings about zero scored rules and activate those rules.

Possibly, though that only seems to be partially the problem. There are sandbox rules with non-net scoresets scored but network scoresets zeroed. Some of these are _not_ dependency roots, e.g. MONEY_FRAUD_5, so your proposed change wouldn't fix them.

I'd suggest _no_ rule in 72_scores should get a zero score for any scoreset. If it's good enough to be promoted it should have at least a 0.001 score.

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 [email protected]    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a [email protected]
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  ...the Fates notice those who buy chainsaws...
                                              -- www.darwinawards.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Today: Halloween

Reply via email to