https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6510
Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgr...@pccc.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kmcgr...@pccc.com
--- Comment #10 from Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgr...@pccc.com> 2010-11-08 11:20:42
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> > I've discovered that most, but not all, of the rules that have problems have
> > been promoted due to "tflags publish"... which means they weren't
> > necessarily
> > selected for promotion due to mass-check results (which may explain their
> > low
> > or zero scores).
> No doubt a rule can be or become useless by itself but still be useful as part
> of another rule. Perhaps the fix should be to allow meta rules to use a rule
> with
> a score of 0 without a warning.
If a rule has a score of 0, I've always treated that as 100% disabled and we
would need a flag to disable a rule.
KAM
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
