On 2/10/2011 11:08 PM, Steve Freegard wrote:
It was my understanding that multiple SEM lists were already being
included in the weekly masscheck. I have no objections to it and have
plenty of capacity to handle the queries.
--Blaine Fleming
SEM Admin
Alrighty then. Could you ask him to make a combined zone so it is
possible to query all with a single DNS lookup?
I'm going ahead with the several changes I suggested but keeping the
URI rules disabled for now.
I will update my rules with the correct naming; I've already run a local
network mass-check last night and I'm seeing the results I expected
SEM_FRESH, SEM_FRESH_10, SEM_FRESH_15 all score better than URIBL_RHS_DOB:
OVERALL SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
0 25000 424 0.983 0.00 0.00 (all messages)
0.00000 98.3323 1.6677 0.983 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %)
15.639 15.9040 0.0000 1.000 0.85 0.00 T_SMF_SEM_FRESH_15
15.623 15.8880 0.0000 1.000 0.85 0.00 T_SMF_SEM_FRESH_10
10.954 11.1400 0.0000 1.000 0.83 0.00 T_SMF_SEM_FRESH
9.271 9.4280 0.0000 1.000 0.81 0.00 URIBL_RHS_DOB
BTW, your FRESH rules had typos that indicate they were not behaving as
you expect. See the changes I checked into svn.
Warren
