On Sat, 19 Feb 2011, Justin Mason wrote:
On Friday, February 18, 2011, Warren Togami Jr. <[email protected]>
wrote:
Is there any way our corpora can be part of SOUGHT's safety net
without giving up our privacy?
Unfortunately not --- the generation process makes the entire mail
contents fully visible.
Perhaps yes, though. The generation process could check the masscheck
results of the SOUGHT subrules and permanently suppress any subrules that
hit (a certain threshold of) ham.
It's feedback, just not as immediate as the dedicated SOUGHT ham corpus,
and it doesn't require exposing the masscheck ham corpora. I think that's
what Warren had in mind.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Vista "security improvements" consist of attempting to shift blame
onto the user when things go wrong.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
3 days until George Washington's 279th Birthday
