No comments on this? :( Some offtopic: Could someone give me rights to contribute on the wiki? The username is DanielLemke
Daniel Daniel Lemke wrote: > > I stumbled across the SpamAssassin protocol definition and its examples > while implementing a .net client... > Correct me if misunderstood anything, but aren't they kind of misleading > or just wrong if you have a look at the examples? > > First and second one is absolutely fine, but I've already got a question > about the third one: > One would expect SET as the header you have to specify when > learning/reporting ham or spam. > Having a look to the third example there is a ‘remove’ in the SET header > which is kind of confusing to me (expected a ‘remote’ or so to tell > SpamAssassin to report to a ‘remote’ network like Razor). > > Even more confusing, the fourth example: ‘Revoke a ham message’. > Why is the message-class spam? > Why is it set local? Wouldn’t this cause SpamAssassin to learn this > message as spam for our ‘local’ bayes? > The REMOVE header is set to ‘remove’, I would expect a ‘remote’ again, so > one would interpret it as ‘Remove message from remote network’. > > To learn a message as spam: > TELL SPAMC/1.3\r\n > Message-class: spam\r\n > Set: local\r\n > > To forget a learned message: > TELL SPAMC/1.3\r\n > Remove: local\r\n > > To report a spam message: > TELL SPAMC/1.3\r\n > Message-class: spam\r\n > Set: local, remove\r\n > > To revoke a ham message: > TELL SPAMC/1.3\r\n > Message-class: spam\r\n > Set: local\r\n > Remove: remove\r\n > > Is this a documentation issue or did I mixed up anything here? > > Daniel > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-protocol-examples-tp31001608p31048199.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
