https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6390
Adam Katz <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Adam Katz <[email protected]> 2011-03-04 15:29:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #6) > Hey, I just thought of a way to handle this. Would it be possible to disable > these scores entirely if network rules are enabled, and only enable if network > is disabled? That would eliminate the overlap and make these rules useful. KHOP_SC_TOP200 and KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP* use this to zero their score on net+DNSEval runs. I believe the overlap from the other rules is beneficial. As noted in comment #5, this overlap is intentional and is scored very low on net runs. When run without net support, it is scored higher. When using the net rules but DNSEval is disabled, it is also scored higher. I have adjusted the channel's scores given the current performance from http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20110226-r1074804-n?srcpath=khop_sc_. I also lessened the weight of some of the rules. Spamhaus DROP actually earned more weight due to its surprisingly low average spam scores (it had been zeroed). score KHOP_SC_CIDR8 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 0.2 0 0.2 0 score KHOP_SC_CIDR16 1.0 0.2 1.0 0.2 score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR16 2.0 0.3 2.0 0.4 score KHOP_SC_CIDR24 0.1 0 0.1 0 score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR24 2.7 0.5 2.7 0.5 score KHOP_SC_TOP200 4 0 4 0 # unnecessary if DNSBLs work score KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP 1 0.2 1 0.2 score KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP_LE 2 0 2 0 # adds to KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP score KHOP_PSBL_CIDR24 2 0.6 2 0.6 if (! plugin(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval) ) score KHOP_SC_CIDR8 (0) (0.2) (0) (0.2) # BRBL(98%) score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR8 (0) (0.9) (0) (0.9) # BRBL(98%) score KHOP_SC_CIDR16 (0) (1.5) (0) (1.5) # BRBL(99%), PBL(98%) score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR16 (0) (1.7) (0) (1.7) # BRBL(99%), PBL(94%) score KHOP_SC_CIDR24 (0) (0.9) (0) (0.9) # SC(99) BRBL(96) MSPIKE(96) score KHOP_SC_TOP_CIDR24 (0) (2.5) (0) (2.5) # MSPIKE(99) SC(98) BRBL(97) ... score KHOP_SC_TOP200 (0) (4.4) (0) (4.4) # SC(99) PSBL(99) ... score KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP (0) (3) (0) (3) # SBL(93) score KHOP_PSBL_CIDR24 (0) (1.5) (0) (1.5) # BRBL(98) XBL(95) endif I believe my response to this bug early last year was sufficient to close it. These rules exist in SVN with regular updates purely for vetting purposes since SpamAssassin currently lacks a mechanism to automatically publish timely updates. Anybody looking to use these rules should subscribe to my sa-update channel, which will pull daily+ updates to these CIDR regexps. Any remaining issue with these rules accidentally getting published is a bug related to the "nopublish" tflag rather than with this rule set. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
