On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 19:27 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > You have a track record of going ballistic on the users list over spam
> > waves every once in a while, which more than once [1] turned out to be a
> > problem with a single, DNSWL listed Debian server. Once the diagnosis is
> > to extend your trusted networks, you become unresponsive and outright
> > ignore the suggestion.
> 
> It was NOT Debian.

You might want to review your own thread "Tonns of russian DOT info
spam", and the discussion "DNSWL rules downscoring spam" you joined,
both about 3 weeks ago. In particular your own samples, and the various
posts showing the issue and offering advice.

82.195.75.100 is liszt.debian.org, listed in DNSWL MED

This very server has been shown before to forward spam for you.


> > [1] Those cases where you actually cared to provide samples on request.
> 
> The last five samples I posted where not Debian related...

An arbitrary number pulled out of your ass, already proven wrong by the
references above.


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}

Reply via email to