On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 12:42 -0400, [email protected] wrote: > On 03/21, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > > > Please update your description of your SpamAssassin plugin on > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomPlugins to change the line > > > > > "Updated: Old" to "Updated: YYYY-MM-DD" to represent today's date. > > > > > > > > I don't think the "updated" date should represent today, if that is not > > > > the date of the last update. > > > > > > I do. I don't care when the plugin was last modified. I do care when it > > > was last... confirmed not horribly broken. So "updated" might not be > > > the best wording. That confirmation would be good. But that probably involves some volunteer to actually check it. Rather than base it off on the author to visit his creature every once in a while, without confirming the code. > > Update means just that. And last updated = old is about the same as a > > don't use disclaimer. > > I did create a new entry, there was no "Updated:" before. What would you > prefer it to be? Oh, OK. Though, isn't that pretty much what Status is supposed to be? Possibly with some notes regarding version compatibility. I really don't see the point of this timestamp. How often do you want the authors to update them? What is the exact purpose of an "author was last here" info anyway? > > Rule-sets shouldn't be listed on the CustomPlugins page you referred to. > > And SARE rule-sets e.g. are almost entirely dead by now anyway. Yes, > > they should not be used. > > I sure do fail at communicating with you, sorry. > > I never said it was stuff on the plugins page that had problems with > becoming harmful. People having problems with SARE rules that they never > removed was part of my motivation for cleaning up the plugins page. > > I started with plugins because Warren had expressed interest in working on > the CustomRulesets, and I was bugged by the cruft on the plugins page when > I added the one for DNSWL, so I started with the plugins page. That page sure is in need for some love and clean up. A Table of Contents with relative links would be way cool. Some structuring, rather than chronological order (which some didn't maintain anyway, but added their plugin at the top instead). And perhaps a consistent naming scheme. Plus, of course, clearly marking or moving stuff that is not compatible with recent versions. -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
