https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5491
Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|needs 2 votes |ready to commit --- Comment #11 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-05-05 20:08:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Before we commit this, can we create a test rule that gives us an idea of the > change in HAM/SPAM %'s that hit the rule when it's changed from 76 to 78? > > In short, the code looks great but my concern is that by NOT enforcing the > RFC, > is the rule going to be pointless. I'll change my vote to a +1. To delay the change is almost as pointless. KAM -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
