https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6353
--- Comment #23 from Mark Martinec <[email protected]> 2011-05-11 10:34:23 UTC --- > Giving this a review since there are lots to choose. Feel free to vote on > MISSING_FROM score if you feel like it or have different opinion on the NOTLD > rule. If you mean this one: header T_MISSING_FROM From =~ /^UNSET$/ [if-unset: UNSET] we already have rules: header __HAS_RCVD exists:Received header __HAS_MESSAGE_ID exists:Message-Id header __HAS_DATE exists:Date header __HAS_SUBJECT exists:Subject (which really test for existence of a header field, not just comparing it to some magic reserved string) so why not add a: header __HAS_FROM exists:From and than can have a: meta T_MISSING_FROM !__HAS_FROM -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
