https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6613
Darxus <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Darxus <[email protected]> 2011-06-03 18:41:37 UTC --- http://www.sorbs.net/using.shtml That is kind of unclear, but rhsbl.sorbs.net is for querying hostnames, and dnsbl.sorbs.net is for IPs, so we're not already querying a zone containing this data. But these should at least be added to somebody's sandbox for evaluation. I believe the rules should be: header __FROM_SORBS_RHSBL eval:check_rbl_envfrom('sorbs_rhsbl', 'rhsbl.sorbs.net.') tflags __FROM_SORBS_RHSBL net header FROM_SORBS_BADCONF eval:check_rbl_sub('sorbs_rhsbl', '127.0.0.11') describe FROM_SORBS_BADCONF Envelope sender is in badconf.rhsbl.sorbs.net tflags FROM_SORBS_BADCONF net score FROM_SORBS_BADCONF 0.001 header FROM_SORBS_NOMAIL eval:check_rbl_sub('sorbs_rhsbl', '127.0.0.12') describe FROM_SORBS_NOMAIL Envelope sender is in nomail.rhsbl.sorbs.net tflags FROM_SORBS_NOMAIL net score FROM_SORBS_NOMAIL 0.001 I have low expectations for badconf.rhsbl.sorbs.net, because it sounds possibly identical to bogusmx.rfc-ignorant.org for which we recently killed the DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX rule because it sucked (bug 6526). Is this enough to get a "[review]" in this bug's summary? Or should I create a patch to create myself a sandbox for somebody else to commit? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
