https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6490
--- Comment #46 from D. Stussy <[email protected]> 2011-06-24 00:17:09 UTC --- Re - SPF: I simply find it ironic that an anti-spam oriented organization with such a product as SA wouldn't take steps to validate mail it sends out as non-forged. SPF seems to be the easiest of all (DK/DKIM and PGP so far) to implement. Personally, I assign an SA score of zero to SPF=PASS and positive scores to all the other non-error results detectable (fail, softfail, neutral, and none). However, for SPF=NONE, the score I assigned has not once tipped the classification scale into the spammy range, although it is enough to trip my threshold for attaching an SA report to mail. This is a matter of principle. Nothing more. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
