https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6527
--- Comment #4 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-06-27 21:50:08 UTC --- > #testrules and "tflags nopublish" are two separate parameters. It seems > #testrules in this case was only partially successful. #testrules was completely succesful. It published the rules as T_... > SEM rules are lacking > "tflags nopublish" which likely would have stopped this. Correct which someone removed I'm guessing when nopublish took rules out of 70_sandbox.cf avoiding masscheck. > > 3 - If it doesn't break masschecks, we should consider code to avoid > > publishing > > ANY rules T_ and also add a safety valve parameter that requires a > > --test-rules > > to run them even if they are published. > > In my opinion --test-rules is a needless complication. We'll agree to disagree. I don't like egg on my face and don't want to see this happen a third time. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
