On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 14:04, John Hardin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > >> I also think if the Content Type is missing completely, wouldn't that be a >> good rule? Any indicators that this happens with Ham? > > Dunno. I put a test rule in my sandbox last night, we'll see how it goes.
at a guess I'd say it'd be promising. in this case it's important to identify what "real" MUAs do, and just do that. it's quite possible that they also display the binary as "text", since the message is broken.
