https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6670
Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-10-05 13:25:11 UTC --- A bug such as this would be highly unlikely. Enough so that I would likely tell you to look at other possibilities. For example, is a machine that ALSO runs SpamAssassin delivering the source email with headers and your system is not overwriting those headers? Do you have more than one machine in the mix? In short, I can't confirm the headers for X-Spam were all produced on the same system and based on the variation between them, I would conjecture they likely aren't. A test I often do for this is change the required to 5.01 or something similar. If I see a required=5.00 show up, I know I have an issue. As a side note, due to the rounding in SA, there have been variances where you could get 5.0 but have it not be spam because it might be really 4.99999. Specifically, I unified the rounding between spamc and other parts of SA somewhere in 3.3. I need to look again and get the padding to be the same though from a different ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
