https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6429
--- Comment #19 from Darxus <[email protected]> 2011-10-28 19:20:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) > Seems reasonable to me, though I would still hope that if we could show them > that they are the only large purveyor of ham with those tabs, they would make > this small config change. Does anyone have any numbers? Of the 12201 emails in my ham corpus, all of them that hit either of these two rules are from vger.kernel.org. From ruleqa: MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME WHO/AGE 0 0.6930 0.0143 0.980 0.77 3.80 KB_DATE_CONTAINS_TAB 0 0.6924 0.0143 0.980 0.77 0.26 TAB_IN_FROM The fact that the ham hit rates for those two rules are exactly the same could be additional evidence of Hit rate is 13 of 91022. That's fewer than the (22) hams that hit that I currently have in my corpus, so it could be that all hams in the corpora that hit these rules are from my corpus and from vger. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
