https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6669
Darxus <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Darxus <[email protected]> 2011-11-28 21:03:56 UTC --- Why doesn't ruleqa show any ham hits? Latest net run that includes your corpora: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20111119&rule=FAKE_HELO_MAIL_COM_DOM Is GMX actually using those domains? I just read through the description of this rule, and it's clearly based on the policy of the owner of all of the domains, and if they have all changed hands, perhaps it should just be removed entirely? >From 20_fake_helo_tests.cf: # Suresh says: these will never be used as HELOs from real mail.com relays. # Just check the most recent handover; the connection to a internal host. # This way a legit sender can send to their MSA using that HELO (quite a few # MUAs will do that), but a spammer gets caught. (List of domains comes from # the drop-down list on the Mail.com signup page.) MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME WHO/AGE 0 0.0206 0 1.000 0.51 1.89 FAKE_HELO_MAIL_COM_DOM -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
