https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6724
--- Comment #28 from Karsten Bräckelmann <[email protected]> 2011-12-14 20:28:13 UTC --- > Other than taking out the nice flag which I agreed with comments above likely > shouldn't exist, looks good to me. I am unsure if setting a score in > 50_scores.cf AND the forcepublish is needed for 25_uribl.cf rules but I can't > see how it hurts. I was planning to do the same thing. Frankly, dunno either. But I figured mimicking what's done for the excellent performing rules like URIBL_BLACK won't hurt for a rule not even supposed to ever hit in mass-checks. After all, we *want* these rules to be published. > svn commit -m 'Removed nice flag on _BLOCKED rules' Revision 1214416 > > The DNSWL rules file 70_dnswl.cf probably should be moved out of the sandbox > > eventually. > > I could make this argument for all of the sandbox rules that are published but > that's a higher-level issue than for this ticket. Agreed. Just mentioned it, since it's a complete rule-set file for DNSWL, similar to 25_uribl.cf, even featuring the copyright header. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
