https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6728

Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #2 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-12-15 15:17:11 
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> You're assuming that people exceeding free usage limits will always be using
> spamc/spamd and never the non-client/server form of spamassassin?

I am not assuming that.  I'm hitting the most likely scenario since we need to
keep stateful information.  I didn't think creating lock files was going to be
efficient but that was how I would do it for spamassassin sans spamd.

-- 
Configure bugmail: 
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to