https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6823
--- Comment #5 from Henrik Krohns <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 5085 --> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=5085&action=edit Proposed fix Here's a minimum change patch proposal. I've run it against 20000s/10000h multipart messages and reviewed the diffs of internal data (Data::Dumper(find_parts)) by hand. Zero differences in ham and only few dozen cases of missing end boundary in spam. But that's my very old corpus. So the change looks safe to me.. waiting for another opinion to commit. ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
