https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6828
--- Comment #7 from AXB <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > > tested and using -4 and autolearn only (no manual trainig) on a very mixed > > user base and site wide Bayes has been very reliable.. > > The trouble with making ham autolearning dependent on DNS whitelists is that > the training can change dramatically with the scores of those rules. If you > started training a while ago when RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED scored -4, then you > will have trained on a much wider selection that you if start over now. > Currently you'll be reliant on RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI and combinations like > RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED+RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED, which will mean mostly autogenerated > mail from companies like Amazon, and direct marketing mail, but probably > almost no person to person mail. > > Also if someone turns-off DNS whitelists they wont learn any ham at all. FWIW: On my systems all DNS whitelist/certifiers/SPF/DKIM are disabled. (I don't trust third parties/keys for WLing) Autolearning ham has never been an issue on a mixed language system. (in the last 8 years, I have never fed Bayes manually ) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
