On 11/09, Axb wrote: > On 11/09/2012 05:58 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: > >I think these should be added to the rules: > > > >reuse BAYES_00 > >reuse BAYES_05 > >reuse BAYES_20 > >reuse BAYES_40 > >reuse BAYES_50 > >reuse BAYES_60 > >reuse BAYES_80 > >reuse BAYES_95 > >reuse BAYES_99 > > > >Recently playing around a little with bayes stuff, I noticed there is no > >data for these in http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=%2Fbayes > > > >Then I realized to actually test bayes with masscheck, I needed to copy my > >bayes dbs into masses/spamassassin (which possibly should've been more > >obvious to me). > > > >Then it occurred to me it would probably suck to put everybody's CPUs > >through regenerating all the bayes scores, and that's pretty close to what > >reuse is for. > > Imo, we should't be using any Bayes during masschecks. > It slows up the process, depending on the corpus it can produce a > totally distorted results.
Which is why I suggested using the "reuse" flag, not re-running bayes during masscheck. -- "You shall know the truth, and it shall make you odd." -- Flannery O'Connor http://www.ChaosReigns.com
