Willem, > Hi Spamassassin developers, > > This message was from more than a year ago. We would like to revert our > temporary workaround in Net::DNS. Is it safe now? Is a Spamassassin > released which works without the workaround? > > op 14-12-12 18:37, Kevin A. McGrail schreef: > > On 12/14/2012 12:33 PM, Mark Martinec wrote: > >> 2) ask the Net::DNS folks if they'd be willing to put back the > >> > >> unconditionally double-quoted form for 0.71, and keep it there > >> for at least until SpamAssassin 3.4 really hits the streets; > >> meanwhile suggest people to switch Net::DNS to 0.71 or to 0.68; > >> > >> ... > >> Looking back at what I just wrote, the #2 looks to me > >> the most appealing. > > > > +1. Can you reach out to them and just ask for perhaps 3 months? > > > > Regards, > > KAM
Well, the three months grace period has extended itself to a year, and we are stuck at 3.4.0-RC3 since October. I don't think there are any major blockers for a release, just needs some good will on our part to do it. So I don't have a heart to ask you to stall the pending change in Net::DNS. On the bright side, of those that keep up with most recent releases of perl modules, many of us are already running the unreleased 3.4.0 for a long time (including some derivatives like zimbra), so won't be affected. Mark
