https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7022

--- Comment #12 from AXB <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to John Hardin from comment #11)
> (In reply to AXB from comment #10)
> > 
> > Am I getting this right?
> > 1.- normalization would have to be switched on ?
> 
> Agree.
> 
> > 2.- normalized rules would require a tflag ?
> 
> That's backwards. Running against the normalized text would be the default,
> you'd need a tflag to run against the non-normalized (raw) text.  (I
> hesitate to use "raw" in this discussion, to avoid confusion with "rawbody".)

hmm.. that means that 90% of our rules would have the opt-out tflag when 90% of
the spamflow is detected without normalizing anything?
I must be missing something

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to