On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, [email protected] wrote:
On 04/01, John Hardin wrote:
These appear to be doing pretty good, I've exposed them for scoring
and renamed them to __DX_TEXT_*
Cool, thanks.
Question:
I'm seeing spams that are minor variations on those rules. Do you think
it's better to add more individual static (non-alternation) rules, or
modify those to cover the variants?
Which would be better from the point of view of external optimization
tools, e.g. the rules compiler?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where We Want You To Go Today 09/13/07: Microsoft patents in-OS
adware architecture that incorporates monitoring and analysis of
user actions and interrupting the user to display apparently
relevant advertisements (U.S. Patent #20070214042)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
671 days since the first successful private support mission to ISS (SpaceX)
