On Sun, 20 Apr 2014, Axb wrote:
t/basic_meta.t .................... HEXHASH_WORD depends on
__LCL_ENV_AND_HDR_FROM_MATCH which is nonexistent
HEXHASH_WORD depends on __LCL_ENV_AND_HDR_FROM_MATCH which is nonexistent
HEXHASH_WORD depends on __LCL_ENV_AND_HDR_FROM_MATCH which is nonexistent
HEXHASH_WORD depends on __LCL_ENV_AND_HDR_FROM_MATCH which is nonexistent
t/basic_meta.t .................... 1/2 # Failed test 2 in t/basic_meta.t at
line 91
t/basic_meta.t .................... Failed 1/2 subtests
Blargh. Didn't copy-paste that subrule name and missed typing an
underscore.
Fixed, and added the basic_meta.t test to my lightweight rules validation
script.
So why are some of the dependencies on nonexistent rules causing build
failures while others only cause lint failures? See, for example,
DIGEST_MULTIPLE. It depends on DCC_CHECK, which requires the DCC plugin be
enabled, which is disabled by default because it's not open source.
25_dcc.cf doesn't define DCC_CHECK if the DCC plugin isn't loaded, and
DIGEST_MULTIPLE doesn't have a check for the DCC plugin, so why doesn't
DIGEST_MULTIPLE cause a build failure because DCC_CHECK is essentially
*never* present?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
No representation without taxation!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
3 days until Max Planck's 156th birthday
