https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7101
--- Comment #10 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mark Martinec from comment #9) > but in the above sample the '(via HTTP)' is a *comment* (CFWS), > not a VIA clause! > > I'm not sure if the fix does the right thing. The entire process of parsing these headers is dealing with a number of non-RFC issues to try and deal with real-world, high impact scenarios. I wouldn't even try and deal with this from an RFC standpoint ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
