https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7182
Joe Quinn <jquinn+sa...@pccc.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jquinn+sa...@pccc.com
--- Comment #5 from Joe Quinn <jquinn+sa...@pccc.com> ---
As a good light incentive for writing RFC-compliant SPF records, I would
suggest we write a rule that detects breaking the depth limit.
It should start at 0.001 and increase by perhaps 0.1 per month for two years.
We can start taking a harder stance on this without overly hurting S/O and
those who can't behave in two years will take a 2.4 penalty.
Normally we're not supposed to be RFC enforcers, but there's a degree of
internet neighborliness that I think applies to us, and KAM agrees.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
