https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7182
Joe Quinn <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #5 from Joe Quinn <[email protected]> --- As a good light incentive for writing RFC-compliant SPF records, I would suggest we write a rule that detects breaking the depth limit. It should start at 0.001 and increase by perhaps 0.1 per month for two years. We can start taking a harder stance on this without overly hurting S/O and those who can't behave in two years will take a 2.4 penalty. Normally we're not supposed to be RFC enforcers, but there's a degree of internet neighborliness that I think applies to us, and KAM agrees. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
