https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7271
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Glassey <[email protected]> --- I reckon you don't know anything about me, or my technical abilities. Please do know, however, that I wouldn't file such a "bug" without first ensuring I had all the requirements met. To answer you, I do have my own caching DNS server, it has been working for 2 years now. I can also tell you that my server hasn't been listed in any red/grey/black list since I own it (has been in the past due to its previous owner not being as cautious as me), that it is in a lot of good reputation lists, that I have a DKIM signature that is working, a Dnssec on the configuration process (waiting for my registrar to support it...), amavis running and, of course, a full control on the outgoing mail, with no open smtp port for unauthenticated people. And since I'm currently the only one using the mail server (that is : having active email accounts), the probability to have it listed anywhere is pretty slim. I know that 500 messages per day is really small, other blocklists limit to circa 100'000 a day, that is why I was trying to get the actual limitations from their website. And I don't see it a "technicality" to expect a service that is bundled with free software to state their limitations. One should be clearly informed of what a software can and cannot do. I don't rely heavily on URIBL, it is useful indeed, but other people might need it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
