https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5933
Bill Cole <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |[email protected] | |cconsult.com Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Bill Cole <[email protected]> --- FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS in the current default ruleset only scores >0.1 when Bayes is disabled, but network tests are enabled (score set 1). As such, it is nearly a no-op unless one forces it to a higher score. Also, the contributions to the sample score from rules which do not exist in the current default ruleset is >3.1, while FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS is scored at 2.1. It is also worth noting that the HTML is not simply "not really like Outlook" it is also malformed, with the DOCTYPE tag inside the HTML tag. Fixing that and adding *any* META tag inside the HEAD section would prevent matching FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS. So the original response should have been to advise on how to avoid triggering the rule. I wish there was a way to close a bug as "inexplicably ignored for so long it bit-rotted into irrelevance" but I guess INVALID is as close as Bugzilla gets. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
