https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7518

--- Comment #17 from Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgr...@apache.org> ---
(In reply to RW from comment #16)
> (In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #15)
> 
> > Thought: Why can't that ARGV_SIZE be like 256 to be a more sane limit. 
> 
> The trouble with this is that it supports a bad practice. If postfix can't
> do it directly then spamc needs a default user parameter that's used when
> multiple recipients are passed (as in spamass-milter).

Bad practice aside (since it's listed on our wiki), do you now if it will
technically work?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to