https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7585
John Hardin <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from John Hardin <[email protected]> --- (In reply to RW from comment #2) > IMO if a received header claims to be later than the first trusted relay it > should be ignored. Bear in mind timezones. Would "more than 12h later" (absent making TZ adjustments before comparing) reduce the effectiveness of such a check? The sample at hand is *years* later, is that common? It looks like the (un)trusted and internal/external relays pseudoheaders do not include datetime info. Would it be a good/reasonable/useful idea to extract the relay datetime into those headers (using a consistent normalized-to-UTC format perhaps like "utctime=yyyy-mm-ddThh:mm:ss") in addition to what's already being extracted? Or is this a case of SQUIRREL! ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
