https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7596
Bill Cole <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] | |cconsult.com --- Comment #9 from Bill Cole <[email protected]> --- (In reply to John Hardin from comment #8) > (In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #7) > > Just confirmed that code for the support to use sha256 by default for rule > > signatures and that sha1 is used as secondary if sha256 does not exist IS in > > 3.4 and trunk. > > Oh, good. > > I'd suggest again: if both are present we should validate both. It sounds > like that would be a minor code change. Not at all. It would be a non-change. It's how the code was designed from the start. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
