https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7614
Sidney Markowitz <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Sidney Markowitz <[email protected]> --- I'm +1 on doing this, however I think we should include plans for phasing out use of SHA-1, which implies some end of life date for the older versions of SpamAssassin that use it. One thing that would make a difference in continuing with a variance - Does SpamAssassin 3.3.3 have any option to accept rules if the SHA-1 hash matches but another hash or digital signature does not match? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
