https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7729
--- Comment #12 from Henrik Krohns <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #10) > Thanks for the clarification. I rescind my veto if the patch is different > in that 3.4 requires a tflag not to eval the subject as part of the body and > 4.0 by default requires a tlag to eval the subject, that's ok. No, I think I will always vote -1 for 4.0 if you are suggesting to drop subject by default. People are still using even 3.3, this subject stuff has been in so long there that it would be probably silly to change now. And even sillier to commit 3.4 with a "nosubject" flag and 4.0 with a "subject" flag. I think very few rules actually would NOT want to match subject. So it makes sense to have a "nosubject" flag, instead of "subject" flag. But I'm working on so many things right now, it's hard to concentrate, I reserve the right to change my mind later. :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
