On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:22:55AM +0100, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 12:15:08PM +0200, Henrik K wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 10:26:40AM +0100, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I noticed that at least a couple of rules are not correctly checked
> > > during masscheck and they never hit.
> > > In my corpus I have emails that matches at least FROMNAME_SPOOFED_EMAIL
> > > (~pds/20_fns.cf) and GB_HASHBL_BTC (~gbechis/20_btc.cf) but I cannot
> > > find any trace of those rules in my masses log files.
> > > Both rules are using a plugin that is not enabled by default;
> > > before I start digging into masses/*, anybody knows which plugins are
> > > used during masscheckwork and why ?
> >
> > Default plugins are used, nothing strange there..
> >
> > Already posted before asking if people are interested in masschecking DCC,
> > now that the reputation data is free too. But I guess it's no surprise that
> > no one even responsed and I'm still the only one masschecking it..
> >
> > run_all_masschecks() {
> > run_masscheck single-corpus --all \
> > --pre 'loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC' \
> >
> I am not using DCC at all on my setups but it could be useful to run
> masscheck with more
> plugins enabled (and reuse), otherwise lot of rules will never be
> promoted.
Added FNS and HashBL just in time for todays net masscheck..
run_masscheck single-corpus --all \
--pre 'loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC' \
--pre 'loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::FromNameSpoof' \
--pre 'loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::HashBL' \
