On Tue, 8 Feb 2022, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Since we don't seem to have consensus on changing the default does anybody
object to a pre-file that disables it? That would be more clearly
documented in people will look at the pre-file for V4.
+1 for making it explicitly disabled in the v4.0 PRE file.
I was going to respond "I have no objections" to the initial request but
I've been recovering from a hardware failure in my mail server... :(
Regards, KAM
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022, 04:43 Giovanni Bechis <giova...@paclan.it> wrote:
On 2/7/22 20:03, Henrik K wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 06:32:18PM +0100, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
Hi,
as per Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf(3), bayes_auto_learn defaults to 1/true.
Is anybody against changing its default value to 0/false on trunk (aka
SpamAssassin 4.x) ?
What is the reasoning for this proposal?
IMHO using autolearn without a correct learning process frequently poisons
bayes data, I think bayes_auto_learn should be enabled only if you know
what you are doing and not by default.
I understand that changing a default value now could be a problem for
users.
Giovanni
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The yardstick you should use when considering whether to support a
given piece of legislation is "what if my worst enemy is chosen to
administer this law?"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
74 more days working to pay your (average) annual US tax bill
before you're finally working for yourself.
