https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8119
--- Comment #9 from Zounp <zo...@protonmail.ch> --- (In reply to Bill Cole from comment #6) > Fixed the documentation gap: > > Index: sa-update.raw > =================================================================== > --- sa-update.raw (revision 1907762) > +++ sa-update.raw (working copy) > @@ -2056,6 +2056,19 @@ > I<updates.spamassassin.org>, which has updated rules since the previous > release. > > +NOTE: channel names are domain names, but DO NOT typically have any DNS > +records other than (maybe) NS records. There is a tree of records below that > +name which denote the SpamAssassin version and resolve that name to the > +version number of the latest rules, e.g. to find the latest update > +version number for SpamAssassin v4.0.0: > + > + $ host -t txt 0.0.4.updates.spamassassin.org > + 0.0.4.updates.spamassassin.org is an alias for > 3.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org. > + 3.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org descriptive text "1907730" > + > +That also illuminates the fact that the current ruleset is supposed to be > +backward-compatible to v3.3.3. > + > Update archives are verified using GPG signatures by default. If GPG is > disabled (not recommended), file integrity is checked with SHA512 or SHA256 > checksums. > > Committed in r1907763 Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
