https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8323
Bill Cole <billc...@apache.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |billc...@apache.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from Bill Cole <billc...@apache.org> ---
Theory is great. Our RuleQA process disagrees with it. SA scores are based on
RuleQA, NOT THEORY.
This is not a bug. If you want softfails to be less correlated to spam than
hardfails you will need to get spammers and legitimate senders to behave
differently in a manner that is detectable in the scan results we collect from
cooperating users. OR you can set your local scores however you like to suit
your local circumstances and policies. Note that both rules may be used in
meta-rules including those provided by 3rd parties (e.g. the KAM update
channel) so it may be the case that some or even most messages hitting one of
the rules will hit others which are related.
Further discussion of this sort of issue belongs on the SpamAssassin Users'
mailing list: us...@spamassassin.apache.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
