Hi David, On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:13 PM, dlwh <david.lw.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm happy to help fix any problems. I've verified at points that the > implementation gives the exact same sequence of iterates for a few different > functions (with a particular line search) as the c port of lbfgs. So I'm a > little surprised it fails where Fortran succeeds... but only a little. This > was fixed late last year. I'm working on a reproducible test case using breeze vs fortran implementation to show the problem I've run into. The test will be in one of the test cases in my Spark fork, is it okay for you to investigate the issue? Or do I need to make it as a standalone test?
Will send you the test later today. Thanks. Sincerely, DB Tsai Machine Learning Engineer Alpine Data Labs -------------------------------------- Web: http://alpinenow.com/
