Adding new build modules is pretty high overhead, so if this is a case
where a small amount of duplicated code could get rid of the
dependency, that could also be a good short-term option.
- Patrick
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Matei Zaharia <matei.zaha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, I'd just add a spark-util that has these things.
>
> Matei
>
> On Jul 14, 2014, at 1:04 PM, Michael Armbrust <mich...@databricks.com>
> wrote:
>
> Yeah, sadly this dependency was introduced when someone consolidated the
> logging infrastructure. However, the dependency should be very small and
> thus easy to remove, and I would like catalyst to be usable outside of
> Spark. A pull request to make this possible would be welcome.
>
> Ideally, we'd create some sort of spark common package that has things like
> logging. That way catalyst could depend on that, without pulling in all of
> Hadoop, etc. Maybe others have opinions though, so I'm cc-ing the dev list.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Yanbo Liang <yanboha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Make Catalyst independent of Spark is the goal of Catalyst, maybe need
>> time and evolution.
>> I awared that package org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.util embraced
>> org.apache.spark.util.{Utils => SparkUtils},
>> so that Catalyst has a dependency on Spark core.
>> I'm not sure whether it will be replaced by other component independent of
>> Spark in later release.
>>
>>
>> 2014-07-14 11:51 GMT+08:00 Aniket Bhatnagar <aniket.bhatna...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> As per the recent presentation given in Scala days
>>> (http://people.apache.org/~marmbrus/talks/SparkSQLScalaDays2014.pdf), it was
>>> mentioned that Catalyst is independent of Spark. But on inspecting pom.xml
>>> of sql/catalyst module, it seems it has a dependency on Spark Core. Any
>>> particular reason for the dependency? I would love to use Catalyst outside
>>> Spark
>>>
>>> (reposted as previous email bounced. Sorry if this is a duplicate).
>>
>>
>
>
