> > However, I haven't seen it be as > high as the 100ms Michael quoted (maybe this was for jobs with tasks that > have much larger objects that take a long time to deserialize?). >
I was thinking more about the average end-to-end latency for launching a query that has 100s of partitions. Its also quite possible that SQLs task launch overhead is higher since we have never profiled how much is getting pulled into the closures.
