Thanks for pointing this out, Matei. I don't think a minor typo like this is a big deal. Hopefully it's clear to everyone this is the 1.2.0 release vote, as indicated by the subject and all of the artifacts.
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Matei Zaharia <matei.zaha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey Patrick, unfortunately you got some of the text here wrong, saying 1.1.0 > instead of 1.2.0. Not sure it will matter since there can well be another RC > after testing, but we should be careful. > > Matei > >> On Nov 28, 2014, at 9:16 PM, Patrick Wendell <pwend...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version >> 1.2.0! >> >> The tag to be voted on is v1.2.0-rc1 (commit 1056e9ec1): >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=spark.git;a=commit;h=1056e9ec13203d0c51564265e94d77a054498fdb >> >> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: >> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-1.2.0-rc1/ >> >> Release artifacts are signed with the following key: >> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc >> >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-1048/ >> >> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at: >> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-1.2.0-rc1-docs/ >> >> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Spark 1.2.0! >> >> The vote is open until Tuesday, December 02, at 05:15 UTC and passes >> if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. >> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 1.1.0 >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >> >> To learn more about Apache Spark, please see >> http://spark.apache.org/ >> >> == What justifies a -1 vote for this release? == >> This vote is happening very late into the QA period compared with >> previous votes, so -1 votes should only occur for significant >> regressions from 1.0.2. Bugs already present in 1.1.X, minor >> regressions, or bugs related to new features will not block this >> release. >> >> == What default changes should I be aware of? == >> 1. The default value of "spark.shuffle.blockTransferService" has been >> changed to "netty" >> --> Old behavior can be restored by switching to "nio" >> >> 2. The default value of "spark.shuffle.manager" has been changed to "sort". >> --> Old behavior can be restored by setting "spark.shuffle.manager" to >> "hash". >> >> == Other notes == >> Because this vote is occurring over a weekend, I will likely extend >> the vote if this RC survives until the end of the vote period. >> >> - Patrick >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@spark.apache.org
