Thanks Akhil! For the one where I change the rest client, how likely would it be that a change like that goes thru? Would it be rejected as an uncommon scenario? I really don't want to have this as a separate form of the branch.
Thanks, Joel ________________________________ From: Akhil Das <ak...@sigmoidanalytics.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:07:08 AM To: Joel Zambrano Cc: dev@spark.apache.org Subject: Re: RestSubmissionClient Basic Auth Either way is fine. Relay proxy would be much easier, adding authentication to the REST client would require you to rebuild and test the piece of code that you wrote for authentication. Thanks Best Regards On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Joel Zambrano <jo...@microsoft.com<mailto:jo...@microsoft.com>> wrote: Hi! We have a gateway with basic auth that relays calls to the head node in our cluster. Is adding support for basic auth the wrong approach? Should we use a relay proxy? I've seen the code and it would probably require adding a few configs and appending the header on the get and post request of the REST submission client. A best strategy would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Joel
