Oh I get it now. I was necessary in the past. Sure, seems like it
could be standardized now.

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:13 AM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote:
> Yea but the earlier email was asking they were introduced in the first
> place.
>
>
> On Friday, September 9, 2016, Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>> Not after SPARK-14642, right?
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote:
>> > There is a package called scala.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Friday, September 9, 2016, Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I was also actually wondering why it is being written like this.
>> >>
>> >> I actually took a look for this before and wanted to fix them but I
>> >> found
>> >> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12077/files#r58041468
>> >>
>> >> So, I kind of persuaded myself that committers already know about it
>> >> and
>> >> there is a reason for this.
>> >>
>> >> I'd like to know the full details why we don't import but write full
>> >> path
>> >> though.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 9 Sep 2016 5:28 a.m., "Jakob Odersky" <ja...@odersky.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> +1 to Sean's answer, importing varargs.
>> >>> In this case the _root_ is also unnecessary (it would be required in
>> >>> case you were using it in a nested package called "scala" itself)
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> >>> > I think the @_root_ version is redundant because
>> >>> > @scala.annotation.varargs is redundant. Actually wouldn't we just
>> >>> > import varargs and write @varargs?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Jacek Laskowski <ja...@japila.pl>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >> Hi,
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> The code is not consistent with @scala.annotation.varargs
>> >>> >> annotation.
>> >>> >> There are classes with @scala.annotation.varargs like
>> >>> >> DataFrameReader
>> >>> >> or functions as well as examples of
>> >>> >> @_root_.scala.annotation.varargs,
>> >>> >> e.g. Window or UserDefinedAggregateFunction.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> I think it should be consistent and @scala.annotation.varargs only.
>> >>> >> WDYT?
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Pozdrawiam,
>> >>> >> Jacek Laskowski
>> >>> >> ----
>> >>> >> https://medium.com/@jaceklaskowski/
>> >>> >> Mastering Apache Spark 2.0 http://bit.ly/mastering-apache-spark
>> >>> >> Follow me at https://twitter.com/jaceklaskowski
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> >> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Marcelo

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to