Oh I get it now. I was necessary in the past. Sure, seems like it could be standardized now.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:13 AM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: > Yea but the earlier email was asking they were introduced in the first > place. > > > On Friday, September 9, 2016, Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> >> Not after SPARK-14642, right? >> >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> wrote: >> > There is a package called scala. >> > >> > >> > On Friday, September 9, 2016, Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> I was also actually wondering why it is being written like this. >> >> >> >> I actually took a look for this before and wanted to fix them but I >> >> found >> >> https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12077/files#r58041468 >> >> >> >> So, I kind of persuaded myself that committers already know about it >> >> and >> >> there is a reason for this. >> >> >> >> I'd like to know the full details why we don't import but write full >> >> path >> >> though. >> >> >> >> >> >> On 9 Sep 2016 5:28 a.m., "Jakob Odersky" <ja...@odersky.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> +1 to Sean's answer, importing varargs. >> >>> In this case the _root_ is also unnecessary (it would be required in >> >>> case you were using it in a nested package called "scala" itself) >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> >>> > I think the @_root_ version is redundant because >> >>> > @scala.annotation.varargs is redundant. Actually wouldn't we just >> >>> > import varargs and write @varargs? >> >>> > >> >>> > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Jacek Laskowski <ja...@japila.pl> >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> Hi, >> >>> >> >> >>> >> The code is not consistent with @scala.annotation.varargs >> >>> >> annotation. >> >>> >> There are classes with @scala.annotation.varargs like >> >>> >> DataFrameReader >> >>> >> or functions as well as examples of >> >>> >> @_root_.scala.annotation.varargs, >> >>> >> e.g. Window or UserDefinedAggregateFunction. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> I think it should be consistent and @scala.annotation.varargs only. >> >>> >> WDYT? >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Pozdrawiam, >> >>> >> Jacek Laskowski >> >>> >> ---- >> >>> >> https://medium.com/@jaceklaskowski/ >> >>> >> Mastering Apache Spark 2.0 http://bit.ly/mastering-apache-spark >> >>> >> Follow me at https://twitter.com/jaceklaskowski >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> >> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >> >>> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Marcelo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org