+1

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Burak Yavuz <brk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Sep 29, 2016 4:33 PM, "Kyle Kelley" <rgb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Yin Huai <yh...@databricks.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
>>>>> version 2.0.1. The vote is open until Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 20:00 PDT and
>>>>> passes if a majority of at least 3+1 PMC votes are cast.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.0.1
>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The tag to be voted on is v2.0.1-rc4 (933d2c1ea4e5f5c4ec8d375b5ccaa
>>>>> 4577ba4be38)
>>>>>
>>>>> This release candidate resolves 301 issues:
>>>>> https://s.apache.org/spark-2.0.1-jira
>>>>>
>>>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.1-rc4-bin/
>>>>>
>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc
>>>>>
>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>> spark-1203/
>>>>>
>>>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.
>>>>> 1-rc4-docs/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Q: How can I help test this release?
>>>>> A: If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by
>>>>> taking an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate,
>>>>> then reporting any regressions from 2.0.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Q: What justifies a -1 vote for this release?
>>>>> A: This is a maintenance release in the 2.0.x series.  Bugs already
>>>>> present in 2.0.0, missing features, or bugs related to new features will
>>>>> not necessarily block this release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Q: What fix version should I use for patches merging into branch-2.0
>>>>> from now on?
>>>>> A: Please mark the fix version as 2.0.2, rather than 2.0.1. If a new
>>>>> RC (i.e. RC5) is cut, I will change the fix version of those patches to
>>>>> 2.0.1.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Luciano Resende
>>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kyle Kelley (@rgbkrk <https://twitter.com/rgbkrk>; lambdaops.com)
>>
>


-- 
Best Regards

Jeff Zhang

Reply via email to