+1 On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Burak Yavuz <brk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Sep 29, 2016 4:33 PM, "Kyle Kelley" <rgb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Yin Huai <yh...@databricks.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark >>>>> version 2.0.1. The vote is open until Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 20:00 PDT and >>>>> passes if a majority of at least 3+1 PMC votes are cast. >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 2.0.1 >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The tag to be voted on is v2.0.1-rc4 (933d2c1ea4e5f5c4ec8d375b5ccaa >>>>> 4577ba4be38) >>>>> >>>>> This release candidate resolves 301 issues: >>>>> https://s.apache.org/spark-2.0.1-jira >>>>> >>>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0.1-rc4-bin/ >>>>> >>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key: >>>>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc >>>>> >>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache >>>>> spark-1203/ >>>>> >>>>> The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at: >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-releases/spark-2.0. >>>>> 1-rc4-docs/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Q: How can I help test this release? >>>>> A: If you are a Spark user, you can help us test this release by >>>>> taking an existing Spark workload and running on this release candidate, >>>>> then reporting any regressions from 2.0.0. >>>>> >>>>> Q: What justifies a -1 vote for this release? >>>>> A: This is a maintenance release in the 2.0.x series. Bugs already >>>>> present in 2.0.0, missing features, or bugs related to new features will >>>>> not necessarily block this release. >>>>> >>>>> Q: What fix version should I use for patches merging into branch-2.0 >>>>> from now on? >>>>> A: Please mark the fix version as 2.0.2, rather than 2.0.1. If a new >>>>> RC (i.e. RC5) is cut, I will change the fix version of those patches to >>>>> 2.0.1. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Luciano Resende >>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Kyle Kelley (@rgbkrk <https://twitter.com/rgbkrk>; lambdaops.com) >> > -- Best Regards Jeff Zhang