We can just start using spip label and link to it.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Cody Koeninger <c...@koeninger.org> wrote: > So to be clear, if I translate that google doc to markup and submit a > PR, you will merge it? > > If we're just using "spip" label, that's probably fine, but we still > need shared filters for open and closed SPIPs so the page can link to > them. > > I do not believe I have jira permissions to share filters, I just > attempted to edit one of mine and do not see an add shares field. > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > Sure, that seems OK to me. I can merge anything like that. > > I think anyone can make a new label in JIRA; I don't know if even the > admins > > can make a new issue type unfortunately. We may just have to mention a > > convention involving title and label or something. > > > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:52 PM Cody Koeninger <c...@koeninger.org> > wrote: > >> > >> I think it ought to be its own page, linked from the more / community > >> menu dropdowns. > >> > >> We also need the jira tag, and for the page to clearly link to filters > >> that show proposed / completed SPIPs > >> > >> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >> > Alrighty, if nobody is objecting, and nobody calls for a VOTE, then, > >> > let's > >> > say this document is the SPIP 1.0 process. > >> > > >> > I think the next step is just to translate the text to some suitable > >> > location. I suggest adding it to > >> > https://github.com/apache/spark-website/blob/asf-site/contributing.md > >> > > >> > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:55 PM Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I think a VOTE is over-thinking it, and is rarely used, but, can't > >> >> hurt. > >> >> Nah, anyone can call a vote. This really isn't that formal. We just > >> >> want to > >> >> declare and document consensus. > >> >> > >> >> I think SPIP is just a remix of existing process anyway, and don't > >> >> think > >> >> it will actually do much anyway, which is why I am sanguine about the > >> >> whole > >> >> thing. > >> >> > >> >> To bring this to a conclusion, I will just put the contents of the > doc > >> >> in > >> >> an email tomorrow for a VOTE. Raise any objections now. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org > >