Let's aim for the 2.3 branch cut on 1st Jan and RC1 a week after that
(i.e., week of 8th Jan)?


On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Holden Karau <hol...@pigscanfly.ca> wrote:

> So personally I’d be in favour or pushing to early January, doing a
> release over the holidays is a little rough with herding all of people to
> vote.
>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:49 PM Erik Erlandson <eerla...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I wanted to check in on the state of the 2.3 freeze schedule.  Original
>> proposal was "late Dec", which is a bit open to interpretation.
>>
>> We are working to get some refactoring done on the integration testing
>> for the Kubernetes back-end in preparation for testing upcoming release
>> candidates, however holiday vacation time is about to begin taking its toll
>> both on upstream reviewing and on the "downstream" spark-on-kube fork.
>>
>> If the freeze pushed into January, that would take some of the pressure
>> off the kube back-end upstreaming. However, regardless, I was wondering if
>> the dates could be clarified.
>> Cheers,
>> Erik
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:13 PM, dji...@dataxu.com <dji...@dataxu.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> What is the process to request an issue/fix to be included in the next
>>> release? Is there a place to vote for features?
>>> I am interested in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13127,
>>> to see
>>> if we can get Spark upgrade parquet to 1.9.0, which addresses the
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-686.
>>> Can we include the fix in Spark 2.3 release?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Dong
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>> --
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>



-- 
Sameer Agarwal
Software Engineer | Databricks Inc.
http://cs.berkeley.edu/~sameerag

Reply via email to