they do seem like real failures on branches 2.0 and 2.1.

regarding infrastructure, centos and ubuntu have lintr pinned to
1.0.1.9000, and installed via:
devtools::install_github('jimhester/lintr@5431140')

builds on branches 2.2+ (and master) are passing R lint checks on both OSes
as well.  this includes PRB builds too.  we're really close!

for once, i feel comfortable saying that i have the R ecosystem locked
down, reproducible and working.  :)

shane


On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Felix Cheung <felixcheun...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> SGTM for old branches.
>
> I recall we need to upgrade to newer lintr since it is missing some tests.
>
> Also these seems like real test failures? Are these only happening in 2.1
> and 2.2?
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu>
> *Sent:* Friday, August 10, 2018 4:04 PM
> *To:* Sean Owen
> *Cc:* Shivaram Venkataraman; Reynold Xin; dev
> *Subject:* Re: [R] discuss: removing lint-r checks for old branches
>
> /agreemsg
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Seems OK to proceed with shutting off lintr, as it was masking those.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 6:01 PM shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> ugh...  R unit tests failed on both of these builds.
>>> https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequest
>>> Builder/94583/artifact/R/target/
>>> https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequest
>>> Builder/94584/artifact/R/target/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 1:58 PM, Shivaram Venkataraman <
>>> shiva...@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sounds good to me as well. Thanks Shane.
>>>>
>>>> Shivaram
>>>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 1:40 PM Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > SGTM
>>>> >
>>>> > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 1:39 PM shane knapp <skn...@berkeley.edu>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25089
>>>> >>
>>>> >> basically since these branches are old, and there will be a greater
>>>> than zero amount of work to get lint-r to pass (on the new ubuntu workers),
>>>> sean and i are proposing to remove the lint-r checks for the builds.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> this is super not important for the 2.4 cut/code freeze, but i
>>>> wanted to get this done before it gets pushed down my queue and before we
>>>> revisit the ubuntu port.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> thanks in advance,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> shane
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Shane Knapp
>>>> >> UC Berkeley EECS Research / RISELab Staff Technical Lead
>>>> >> https://rise.cs.berkeley.edu
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Shane Knapp
>>> UC Berkeley EECS Research / RISELab Staff Technical Lead
>>> https://rise.cs.berkeley.edu
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Shane Knapp
> UC Berkeley EECS Research / RISELab Staff Technical Lead
> https://rise.cs.berkeley.edu
>



-- 
Shane Knapp
UC Berkeley EECS Research / RISELab Staff Technical Lead
https://rise.cs.berkeley.edu

Reply via email to